Fill in a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Form

How to Fill Out Da 2166 9 1

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential process for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs). This guide provides clear steps to ensure accurate and complete submission of the form. Follow these instructions carefully to fill out the form correctly.

1. Begin with Part I - Administrative Data. Enter the following information:
• a. Full name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
• b. Social Security Number (or DOD ID No.)
• c. Rank
• d. Date of Rank
• e. Primary Military Occupational Specialty Code (PMOSC)
• f. Unit, Organization, Station, ZIP Code or APO, Major Command
• g. Status Code
• h. Unit Identification Code (UIC)
• i. Reason for Submission
• j. Period Covered (From/Thru)
• k. Rated Months
• l. Nonrated Codes
• m. Number of Enclosures
• n. Rated NCO's email address (.gov or .mil)
2. Proceed to Part II - Authentication. Fill in the details for the Rater and Senior Rater:
• a1. Rater's name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
• a2. Rater's SSN (or DOD ID No.)
• a3. Rater's signature
• a4. Date (YYYYMMDD)
• a5. Rater's rank, PMOSC/Branch, Organization Duty Assignment
• a6. Rater's email address (.gov or .mil)
• b1. Senior Rater's name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
• b2. Senior Rater's SSN (or DOD ID No.)
• b3. Senior Rater's signature
• b4. Date (YYYYMMDD)
• b5. Senior Rater's rank, PMOSC/Branch, Organization Duty Assignment
• b6. Senior Rater's email address (.gov or .mil)
• c1. Supplementary Reviewer’s name (Last, First, Middle Initial)
• c2. Supplementary Reviewer’s rank, PMOSC/Organization Duty Assignment
• c3. Comments
• c4. Supplementary Reviewer’s signature
• c5. Date (YYYYMMDD)
• c6. Supplementary Reviewer’s email address (.gov or .mil)
3. In Part III - Duty Description, provide the following:
• a. Principal Duty Title
• b. Duty MOSC
• c. Daily Duties and Scope
• d. Areas of Special Emphasis
• e. Appointed Duties
4. Next, complete Part IV - Performance Evaluation. This section includes:
• a. APFT Pass/Fail/Profile: Date
• b. Height and Weight
• c. Comments on Character
• d. Comments on Presence
• e. Comments on Intellect
• f. Comments on Leadership
• g. Comments on Development
• h. Comments on Achievements
5. Finally, move to Part V - Senior Rater Overall Potential. Fill in:
• a. Select the box representing Rated NCO's potential
• b. Comments
• c. List two successive assignments and one broadening assignment

After completing all sections, review the form for accuracy. Ensure that all required signatures are obtained before submission. The completed form will be utilized for the NCO evaluation process, impacting future assignments and opportunities.

Here are 10 common misconceptions about the DA 2166-9-1 form, along with clarifications to help you understand its purpose and use.

• It is only for NCOs. While primarily designed for Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), the form can also be relevant for those in leadership positions evaluating NCO performance.
• It does not require a signature. A signature is necessary to confirm that the rated NCO has reviewed the report and that the administrative data is correct.
• The rater’s evaluation is the only one that matters. Both the rater and the senior rater provide evaluations, and both are important for a comprehensive assessment.
• It’s only about past performance. The form also assesses potential for future assignments and growth within the Army.
• Only negative comments can lead to an appeal. An appeal can be initiated for any perceived inaccuracies or unfair assessments, whether positive or negative.
• It doesn’t impact promotions. The evaluations on this form are considered during promotion boards and can significantly influence career advancement.
• All evaluations must be perfect. Evaluations are meant to reflect the rated NCO’s performance accurately, including areas for improvement.
• There’s no need for counseling. Counseling is an essential part of the evaluation process and helps NCOs understand their performance and areas for growth.
• It can be completed quickly. Completing the form thoroughly and accurately takes time and should be done with careful consideration.
• It’s the same as other evaluation forms. The DA 2166-9-1 has specific requirements and sections that differ from other evaluation forms, making it unique in its purpose and structure.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form is an important task for NCO evaluations. Here are key takeaways to keep in mind:

• Accurate Information is Crucial: Ensure that all personal and administrative data, such as name, SSN, and rank, are filled out correctly. Errors can lead to delays or complications.
• Understand the Purpose: This form evaluates the performance and potential of NCOs. Knowing its significance can help in accurately assessing and documenting performance.
• Follow the Structure: The form is divided into sections. Each part has specific requirements, so follow the structure closely to avoid missing important information.
• Rater and Senior Rater Roles: The rater and senior rater have distinct responsibilities. Familiarize yourself with their roles to ensure accurate evaluations and signatures.
• Performance Evaluation: Provide clear and concise comments regarding the rated NCO's performance. Use specific examples to illustrate strengths and areas for improvement.
• Be Aware of the Appeals Process: The rated NCO should understand that signing the form does not indicate agreement with the evaluation. Familiarity with the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3 is essential.

Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to delays or complications. One frequent error is failing to provide complete and accurate personal information. This includes the name, Social Security Number (SSN), and rank. Omitting any of these details can result in processing issues.

Another common mistake is incorrect dates. The form requires specific date formats, such as YYYYMMDD. If these dates are not entered correctly, it can create confusion regarding the reporting period and other critical timelines.

People often neglect to check the email addresses provided. The form requires a .gov or .mil email for both the rater and senior rater. Using personal email addresses or incorrect formats can hinder communication and verification processes.

Many individuals overlook the section on counseling dates. It is essential to document all counseling sessions accurately. Missing or incorrect dates may lead to questions about compliance with evaluation procedures.

Another mistake is failing to include the required number of enclosures. If additional documents are necessary, they should be clearly listed. Not doing so can result in incomplete submissions and unnecessary delays.

In the performance evaluation section, individuals sometimes provide vague comments. Specificity is crucial; evaluators should include detailed feedback regarding the rated NCO’s performance. General statements do not adequately convey the individual’s strengths or areas for improvement.

Some people forget to sign the form. The rated NCO’s signature is essential for verifying that the administrative data is correct. Without it, the form may be considered incomplete.

Another frequent oversight is neglecting to review the entire form before submission. A thorough review can catch errors or omissions that may have been overlooked initially.

Lastly, individuals may fail to understand the implications of their signature. The rated NCO should recognize that signing the form does not indicate agreement with the evaluations but confirms the accuracy of the information provided.

By avoiding these common mistakes, individuals can ensure a smoother evaluation process and contribute to a more effective assessment of performance.